Union Organizing Through Employer E-mail

December 19th, 2014 | By Jules Halpern Associates | Employee Handbook, Labor Law, NLRA, Technology

Last week the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) issued a much anticipated decision involving employees’ use of their employers’ e-mail. The ruling reverses a seven-year-old decision from the Board that allowed employers to limit electronic communication on their equipment. The decision has immediate implications for employers’ policies on the subject.

Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) protects an employee’s right to engage in “protected concerted activity,” or in other words, the right for employees to communicate and act together to improve their working conditions. Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA prohibits employers from interfering with employees’ Section 7 rights.

In 2007, the Board ruled that employers could prohibit employees from using their internal e-mail systems for Section 7 activity, including any personal communication. However, last week, in Purple Communications, the NLRB reversed course and opened up the use of work e-mail for “protected concerted activity.”

Purple Communications Inc.’s Policy

Purple Communication Inc. (“Purple” or the “Company”), had an employee policy that prohibited workers from using company communications equipment, including company e-mail, to send personal e-mails or engage in activities on behalf of outside organizations (including labor unions). The union attempting to organize Purple’s employees filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB. The union cited this policy in particular, claiming that it interfered with the employees’ rights to communicate with each other and their freedom of choice in the pending union election.

The Board’s “Limited” Decision

 The NLRB held that Purple’s policy interfered with the employees’ Section 7 rights and explained that employees who have permission to use their employers’ e-mail systems can use these systems on their own time for organizing and communication purposes.

The Board “limited” the decision by allowing employers to prohibit non-work use of their e-mail system, if an employer can demonstrate special circumstances that justify the restrictions, such as the need to maintain production or discipline. However, to rationalize a particular restriction, the employer is required to identify a specific interest and explain how the restriction protects that interest.

Practical Implications

The decision reflects the need for employers to check their electronic communications and work e-mail policies, so that they do not prohibit employees from conversing about possible union circumstances during non-work time. The decision also signals to employers that the scope of the rule may expand to smart phones used for work, and communication platforms such as social media and text messaging.

Jules Halpern Associates LLC

Workplace and Education Law Advisors

Jules Halpern Associates LLC
JULES HALPERN ASSOCIATES LLC is a boutique law firm committed to serving our clients in all facets of their workplace issues. We provide personalized, practical advice that resonates with our clients’ business objectives.
1225 Franklin Ave, Suite 200 Garden City NY 11530 516-466-3200 https://plus.google.com/u/0/104226190479443206790/posts
45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2000 New York NY 10111 212-786-7380 https://plus.google.com/u/0/114488933127716576681/posts
Jules Z. Halpern


Long Island Office
1225 Franklin Ave | Suite 200
Garden City, New York 11530
tel: 516.466.3200 | fax: 212.658.9313

New York City Office
45 Rockefeller Plaza | Suite 2000
New York, New York 10111
tel: 212.786.7380 | fax: 212.658.9313

Real Workplace Issues Newsletter

Please enter your e-mail address below to sign up for our topical e-newsletter, Real Workplace Issues.

Follow Us

  • linkedin
  • Facebook
  • Halpern Associates on Twitter

Copyright © 2019 All rights reserved Jules Halpern Associates LLC | Attorney Advertising