Question 1

Are employee discrimination claims against religious schools barred when the employee’s duties involve religious instruction?

Accepted Answer

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court indicated in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru that employee discrimination claims against religious schools are barred when the employee’s duties involve religious instruction. The decision can be found here. The Court asserted that such lawsuits stifle the freedom of religion granted by the First Amendment, insofar as that religious institutions should have the sole discretion as to who passes along religious knowledge to youngsters. This rationale, seen in a 2012 case, has been called the “ministerial exception” by the media and has great potential impact on the lives of employees who are charged with faith education at religious institutions.

Question 2

What was the ruling in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru?

Accepted Answer

The Court framed the issue as whether the First Amendment, which grants religious freedom, permits the government to interfere with employment decisions at religious institutions, where employees have the duty of instructing students on the tenets of their shared faith. The Court indicates that the “selection and supervision” of teachers in religious schools is crucial to their mission of furthering the religious education of children. As such, the Court views interfering with employment decisions of religious educators as an infringement upon First Amendment rights. Although the employees in these cases were not “ministers” in the sense that they were not formal religious leaders, they taught religion to students, said daily prayers with students, and attended Catholic Mass with them. Use of the term “minister” is not crucial to an employee falling into the exception, as many religions do not use the term at all. Rather, what matters is that an employee is involved with “educating and forming” the faith of students at the organization.

Question 3

Is any employee at a religious organization subject to the ministerial exception?

Accepted Answer

If a position does fall under the ministerial exception, courts will not oversee hiring, firing, or promotions, even if decisions are seemingly based in discriminatory practice. The Court provides the following guidance as to who falls under the exception: “What matters, at bottom, is what the employee does.” As such, it does not seem likely that courts will interpret this decision to mean that any employee at a religious organization is subject to the ministerial exception. However, it still has powerful implications for any employee who is charged with religious education.

Discrimination

Supreme Court Maintains Religious School Exemption

LGBTQ Supreme Court Decision

Coronavirus Workplace Awareness

Temp Workers’ Protections

LGBTQ GENDA Workplace Protections

Sexual Harassment Laws Change Legal Landscape in New York State and City

Sexual Orientation Included as Civil Rights Protection

Training Supervisors on HR Issues

Harvey Weinstein – A Time for Action